GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Arc A770
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1650 Max-Q | Arc A770 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 731 | 7,224 | -89.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 68 | -64.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 41 | -68.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 23 | -73.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.1 | 17.2 | -87.8% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 448 | -75.0% |
| TDP (W) | 33 | 225 | — |
- Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 68% faster.
- GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
Verdict: GTX 1650 Max-Q or Arc A770?
GTX 1650 Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+85%)
Arc A770 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+68%)
- 4K gaming (+74%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Arc A770: which should you choose?
GTX 1650 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Arc A770 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Arc A770: Arc A770 is faster for gaming. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 68% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770 averages 41 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 23 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 33 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 Max-Q better than the Arc A770?
Arc A770 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 68% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Max-Q and the Arc A770?
Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 68% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.