Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1650 Max-Q vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Verdict
GTX 1650 Max-Q vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1650 Max-QRTX PRO 6000 BlackwellDifference
3DMark Time Spy73137,898-98.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p24272-91.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p13174-92.5%
Avg FPS @ 4K699-93.9%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.1108.3-98.1%
VRAM4 GB GDDR596 GB GDDR7
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)1121,344-91.7%
TDP (W)33300
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 174 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 93% faster.
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 300W).

Verdict: GTX 1650 Max-Q or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

Our recommendation
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 1650 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+89%)

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+93%)
  • 4K gaming (+94%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+98%)
  • Video memory (+96%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+92%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell if you game at 1440p.

GTX 1650 Max-Q vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: which should you choose?

GTX 1650 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2026, Blackwell) with 96 GB of GDDR7, averaging 174 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1650 Max-Q vs RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is faster for gaming. RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 174 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 93% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 300W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 174 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 99 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 96GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 33 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1650 Max-Q better than the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 174 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 93% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Max-Q and the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell?

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 174 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 93% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 300W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1650 Max-Q profile → RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons