Arc A770 vs GTX 1650 Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Arc A770 | GTX 1650 Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,224 | 731 | +888.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 68 | 24 | +183.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 41 | 13 | +215.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 23 | 6 | +283.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 17.2 | 2.1 | +723.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 112 | +300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 225 | 33 | — |
- Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 215% faster.
- GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
Verdict: Arc A770 or GTX 1650 Max-Q?
Arc A770 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+68%)
- 4K gaming (+74%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
GTX 1650 Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+85%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Arc A770 vs GTX 1650 Max-Q: which should you choose?
Arc A770 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
GTX 1650 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Arc A770 vs GTX 1650 Max-Q: Arc A770 is faster for gaming. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 215% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A770 averages 41 fps against 13. At 4K (23 vs 6 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 225 W versus 33 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Arc A770 better than the GTX 1650 Max-Q?
Arc A770 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 215% faster.
What is the main difference between the Arc A770 and the GTX 1650 Max-Q?
Arc A770 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 215% faster. GTX 1650 Max-Q draws less power (33W vs 225W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Arc A770 if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 1650 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.