SGX543MP4 vs RX M 6800 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | SGX543MP4 | RX M 6800 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 50 | 7,400 | -99.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 2 | 69 | -97.1% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 13 | 448 | -97.1% |
| TDP (W) | 2 | 195 | — |
- These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 2020), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: SGX543MP4 or RX M 6800 XT?
SGX543MP4 advantages
- Power efficiency (+99%)
RX M 6800 XT advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+99%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+97%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the SGX543MP4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
SGX543MP4 vs RX M 6800 XT: which should you choose?
SGX543MP4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2012, Series5XT) with 0 MB of Shared.
RX M 6800 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 42 fps at 1440p.
SGX543MP4 vs RX M 6800 XT: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 2020), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: SGX543MP4 (2012, Integrated) and RX M 6800 XT (2020, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
SGX543MP4 carries 0 MB of Shared against 16 GB of GDDR6 on RX M 6800 XT, with board powers of 2 W and 195 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the SGX543MP4 better than the RX M 6800 XT?
RX M 6800 XT takes the overall edge, though SGX543MP4 wins in specific areas worth weighing. These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 2020), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the SGX543MP4 and the RX M 6800 XT?
These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 2020), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the SGX543MP4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.