RX M 6800 XT vs SGX543MP4
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 6800 XT | SGX543MP4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 7,400 | 50 | +14,700.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 69 | 2 | +3,350.0% |
| VRAM | 16 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 13 | +3,400.0% |
| TDP (W) | 195 | 2 | — |
- These GPUs come from different eras (2020 vs 2012), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: RX M 6800 XT or SGX543MP4?
RX M 6800 XT advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+99%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+97%)
SGX543MP4 advantages
- Power efficiency (+99%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
- Choose the SGX543MP4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
RX M 6800 XT vs SGX543MP4: which should you choose?
RX M 6800 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 42 fps at 1440p.
SGX543MP4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2012, Series5XT) with 0 MB of Shared.
RX M 6800 XT vs SGX543MP4: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (2020 vs 2012), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: RX M 6800 XT (2020, Desktop) and SGX543MP4 (2012, Integrated) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
RX M 6800 XT carries 16 GB of GDDR6 against 0 MB of Shared on SGX543MP4, with board powers of 195 W and 2 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 6800 XT better than the SGX543MP4?
RX M 6800 XT takes the overall edge, though SGX543MP4 wins in specific areas worth weighing. These GPUs come from different eras (2020 vs 2012), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the RX M 6800 XT and the SGX543MP4?
These GPUs come from different eras (2020 vs 2012), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 6800 XT if you want the higher benchmark performance overall. Choose the SGX543MP4 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.