Savage4 Pro vs GTX 770 Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Savage4 Pro | GTX 770 Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8 MB SDR | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 1 | 224 | -99.6% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 103 | — |
- These GPUs come from different eras (1999 vs 2013), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: Savage4 Pro or GTX 770 Max-Q?
Savage4 Pro advantages
- Power efficiency (+85%)
GTX 770 Max-Q advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+100%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Savage4 Pro if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Savage4 Pro vs GTX 770 Max-Q: which should you choose?
Savage4 Pro — S3 desktop graphics card (1999, Savage4 Core) with 8 MB of SDR; launched at $99.
GTX 770 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Savage4 Pro vs GTX 770 Max-Q: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (1999 vs 2013), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: Savage4 Pro (1999, Desktop) and GTX 770 Max-Q (2013, Laptop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
Savage4 Pro carries 8 MB of SDR against 2 GB of GDDR5 on GTX 770 Max-Q, with board powers of 15 W and 103 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Savage4 Pro better than the GTX 770 Max-Q?
GTX 770 Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Savage4 Pro wins in specific areas worth weighing. These GPUs come from different eras (1999 vs 2013), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the Savage4 Pro and the GTX 770 Max-Q?
These GPUs come from different eras (1999 vs 2013), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Savage4 Pro if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.