GTX 770 Max-Q vs Savage4 Pro
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 770 Max-Q | Savage4 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 8 MB SDR | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 1 | +22,300.0% |
| TDP (W) | 103 | 15 | — |
- These GPUs come from different eras (2013 vs 1999), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: GTX 770 Max-Q or Savage4 Pro?
GTX 770 Max-Q advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+100%)
Savage4 Pro advantages
- Power efficiency (+85%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Savage4 Pro if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
GTX 770 Max-Q vs Savage4 Pro: which should you choose?
GTX 770 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Savage4 Pro — S3 desktop graphics card (1999, Savage4 Core) with 8 MB of SDR; launched at $99.
GTX 770 Max-Q vs Savage4 Pro: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (2013 vs 1999), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: GTX 770 Max-Q (2013, Laptop) and Savage4 Pro (1999, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
GTX 770 Max-Q carries 2 GB of GDDR5 against 8 MB of SDR on Savage4 Pro, with board powers of 103 W and 15 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 770 Max-Q better than the Savage4 Pro?
GTX 770 Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Savage4 Pro wins in specific areas worth weighing. These GPUs come from different eras (2013 vs 1999), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the GTX 770 Max-Q and the Savage4 Pro?
These GPUs come from different eras (2013 vs 1999), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Savage4 Pro if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.