Graphics Card Comparison

RX M Vega 56 vs Arc A570M

Verdict
RX M Vega 56 vs Arc A570M: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M Vega 56Arc A570MDifference
3DMark Time Spy3,1362,234+40.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4034+17.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2319+21.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K1210+20.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)9.05.3+68.4%
VRAM8 GB HBM28 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)410224+83.0%
TDP (W)13675
  • RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

Verdict: RX M Vega 56 or Arc A570M?

Our recommendation
RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M Vega 56 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+17%)
  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+29%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+45%)

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+45%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M Vega 56 vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?

RX M Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 23 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RX M Vega 56 vs Arc A570M: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps against 19. At 4K (12 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 136 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M Vega 56 better than the Arc A570M?

RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M Vega 56 and the Arc A570M?

RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 21% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M Vega 56 profile → Arc A570M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons