Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A570M vs RX M Vega 56

Verdict
Arc A570M vs RX M Vega 56: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A570MRX M Vega 56Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,2343,136-28.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3440-15.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1923-17.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K1012-16.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.39.0-40.6%
VRAM8 GB GDDR68 GB HBM2
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224410-45.4%
TDP (W)75136
  • RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

Verdict: Arc A570M or RX M Vega 56?

Our recommendation
RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+45%)

RX M Vega 56 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+17%)
  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+29%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+45%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M Vega 56: which should you choose?

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RX M Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 23 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs RX M Vega 56: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 12 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 136 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A570M better than the RX M Vega 56?

RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the RX M Vega 56?

RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 17% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 136W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A570M profile → RX M Vega 56 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons