Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 7700 XT vs GTX 1660

Verdict
RX M 7700 XT vs GTX 1660: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 7700 XTGTX 1660Difference
3DMark Time Spy6,2741,760+256.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p6131+96.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p3717+117.6%
Avg FPS @ 4K209+122.2%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)14.95.0+197.0%
VRAM12 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)336168+100.0%
TDP (W)159120
  • RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 118% faster.
  • GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

Verdict: RX M 7700 XT or GTX 1660?

Our recommendation
RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 7700 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+54%)
  • 4K gaming (+55%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+72%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

GTX 1660 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+25%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M 7700 XT vs GTX 1660: which should you choose?

RX M 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 37 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1660 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $219.

RX M 7700 XT vs GTX 1660: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 118% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps against 17. At 4K (20 vs 9 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 159 W versus 120 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 7700 XT better than the GTX 1660?

RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 118% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 7700 XT and the GTX 1660?

RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 118% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 7700 XT profile → GTX 1660 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons