Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1660 vs RX M 7700 XT

Verdict
GTX 1660 vs RX M 7700 XT: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1660RX M 7700 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,7606,274-71.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3161-49.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1737-54.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K920-55.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.014.9-66.3%
VRAM6 GB GDDR512 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168336-50.0%
TDP (W)120159
  • RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 54% faster.
  • GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

Verdict: GTX 1660 or RX M 7700 XT?

Our recommendation
RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 1660 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+25%)

RX M 7700 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+54%)
  • 4K gaming (+55%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+72%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.

GTX 1660 vs RX M 7700 XT: which should you choose?

GTX 1660 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $219.

RX M 7700 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2023, RDNA 3) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 37 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1660 vs RX M 7700 XT: RX M 7700 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 54% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps against 17. At 4K (9 vs 20 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 120 W versus 159 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1660 better than the RX M 7700 XT?

RX M 7700 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 54% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1660 and the RX M 7700 XT?

RX M 7700 XT averages 37 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 54% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 159W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 7700 XT if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1660 profile → RX M 7700 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons