Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 6400 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q

Verdict
RX M 6400 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 6400NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,2723,997-68.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2846-39.1%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1527-44.4%
Avg FPS @ 4K814-42.9%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.011.4-73.5%
VRAM4 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112672-83.3%
TDP (W)34126
  • NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 44% faster.
  • RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

Verdict: RX M 6400 or NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

Our recommendation
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 6400 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+73%)

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+44%)
  • 4K gaming (+43%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+68%)
  • Video memory (+83%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+83%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 6400 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

RX M 6400 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: which should you choose?

RX M 6400 — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6400 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 44% faster. RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps against 15. At 4K (8 vs 14 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 34 W versus 126 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 6400 better than the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 44% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 6400 and the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 44% faster. RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 6400 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 6400 profile → NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons