Graphics Card Comparison

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs RX M 6400

Verdict
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs RX M 6400: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricNVIDIA Titan RTX Max-QRX M 6400Difference
3DMark Time Spy3,9971,272+214.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4628+64.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2715+80.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K148+75.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)11.43.0+276.9%
VRAM24 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)672112+500.0%
TDP (W)12634
  • NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 80% faster.
  • RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

Verdict: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q or RX M 6400?

Our recommendation
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+44%)
  • 4K gaming (+43%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+68%)
  • Video memory (+83%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+83%)

RX M 6400 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+73%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RX M 6400 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs RX M 6400: which should you choose?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.

RX M 6400 — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs RX M 6400: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 80% faster. RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps against 15. At 4K (14 vs 8 fps) VRAM (24GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 126 W versus 34 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q better than the RX M 6400?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 80% faster.

What is the main difference between the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q and the RX M 6400?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 80% faster. RX M 6400 draws less power (34W vs 126W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 6400 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q profile → RX M 6400 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons