RX M 590 vs A100 PCIe 80GB
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 590 | A100 PCIe 80GB | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,117 | 6,821 | -69.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 65 | -47.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 39 | -51.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 21 | -52.4% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 6.1 | 19.5 | -69.0% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 80 GB HBM2e | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 1,935 | -88.4% |
| TDP (W) | 146 | 300 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.9 | 9.7 | -90.7% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 71 | -84.5% |
- A100 PCIe 80GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 51% faster.
- RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 300W).
Verdict: RX M 590 or A100 PCIe 80GB?
RX M 590 advantages
- Power efficiency (+51%)
A100 PCIe 80GB advantages
- 1440p gaming (+51%)
- 4K gaming (+52%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+69%)
- Video memory (+90%)
- Memory bandwidth (+88%)
- AI image generation (+91%)
- Local LLM inference (+85%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 590 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the A100 PCIe 80GB if you game at 1440p.
RX M 590 vs A100 PCIe 80GB: which should you choose?
RX M 590 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
A100 PCIe 80GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2020, Ampere) with 80 GB of HBM2e, averaging 39 fps at 1440p.
RX M 590 vs A100 PCIe 80GB: A100 PCIe 80GB is faster for gaming. A100 PCIe 80GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 51% faster. RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 300W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the A100 PCIe 80GB averages 39 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 21 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 80GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the A100 PCIe 80GB is quicker for AI image generation (9.7 vs 0.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (71 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 146 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 590 better than the A100 PCIe 80GB?
A100 PCIe 80GB is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. A100 PCIe 80GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 51% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 590 and the A100 PCIe 80GB?
A100 PCIe 80GB averages 39 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 51% faster. RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 300W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 590 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the A100 PCIe 80GB if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.