Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 590 vs RTX 5090

Verdict
RX M 590 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 590RTX 5090Difference
3DMark Time Spy2,11740,000-94.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p34286-88.1%
Avg FPS @ 1440p19183-89.6%
Avg FPS @ 4K10105-90.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)6.1104.8-94.2%
VRAM8 GB GDDR532 GB GDDR7
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)2241,792-87.5%
TDP (W)146575
Stable Diffusion (it/s)0.941.9-97.9%
LLM inference (tokens/s)11143-92.3%
  • RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 90% faster.
  • RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 575W).

Verdict: RX M 590 or RTX 5090?

Our recommendation
RTX 5090 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 590 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+75%)

RTX 5090 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+90%)
  • 4K gaming (+90%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+95%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+88%)
  • AI image generation (+98%)
  • Local LLM inference (+92%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 590 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.

RX M 590 vs RTX 5090: which should you choose?

RX M 590 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

RTX 5090 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 32 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.

RX M 590 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 90% faster. RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 575W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 averages 183 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 105 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 32GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the RTX 5090 is quicker for AI image generation (41.9 vs 0.9 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (143 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 146 W versus 575 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 590 better than the RTX 5090?

RTX 5090 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 90% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 590 and the RTX 5090?

RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 90% faster. RX M 590 draws less power (146W vs 575W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 590 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 590 profile → RTX 5090 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons