RX M 560 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX M 560 | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 777 | 1,650 | -52.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 25 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 12 | +8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 5 | +20.0% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 68 | +64.0% |
| TDP (W) | 52 | 15 | — |
- RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
Verdict: RX M 560 or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX M 560 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- 4K gaming (+17%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+39%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+53%)
- Power efficiency (+71%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
- Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
RX M 560 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: which should you choose?
RX M 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RX M 560 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: RX M 560 is faster for gaming. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 560 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 5 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 52 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX M 560 better than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX M 560 takes the overall edge, though Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX M 560 and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.