Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 560
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | RX M 560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,650 | 777 | +112.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 25 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 13 | -7.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 6 | -16.7% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 68 | 112 | -39.0% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 52 | — |
- RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
Verdict: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU or RX M 560?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+53%)
- Power efficiency (+71%)
RX M 560 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- 4K gaming (+17%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+39%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
- Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 560: which should you choose?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RX M 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 560: RX M 560 is faster for gaming. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 560 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (5 vs 6 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 15 W versus 52 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU better than the RX M 560?
RX M 560 takes the overall edge, though Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and the RX M 560?
RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 52W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall. Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.