Graphics Card Comparison

RX M 5500 XT vs GTX 1630

Verdict
RX M 5500 XT vs GTX 1630: RX M 5500 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M 5500 XTGTX 1630Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,547732+111.3%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3024+25.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1613+23.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K86+33.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.41.8+141.5%
VRAM8 GB GDDR64 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224112+100.0%
TDP (W)8475
  • RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 23% faster.
  • GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).

Verdict: RX M 5500 XT or GTX 1630?

Our recommendation
RX M 5500 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M 5500 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+19%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+53%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

GTX 1630 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+11%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1630 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M 5500 XT vs GTX 1630: which should you choose?

RX M 5500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, RDNA 1) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1630 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $169.

RX M 5500 XT vs GTX 1630: RX M 5500 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 23% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps against 13. At 4K (8 vs 6 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 84 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M 5500 XT better than the GTX 1630?

RX M 5500 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 23% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M 5500 XT and the GTX 1630?

RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 23% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 1630 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M 5500 XT profile → GTX 1630 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons