GTX 1630 vs RX M 5500 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1630 | RX M 5500 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 732 | 1,547 | -52.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 30 | -20.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 16 | -18.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 8 | -25.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 4.4 | -58.6% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 224 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 84 | — |
- RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster.
- GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).
Verdict: GTX 1630 or RX M 5500 XT?
GTX 1630 advantages
- Power efficiency (+11%)
RX M 5500 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+19%)
- 4K gaming (+25%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+53%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1630 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you game at 1440p.
GTX 1630 vs RX M 5500 XT: which should you choose?
GTX 1630 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $169.
RX M 5500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, RDNA 1) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
GTX 1630 vs RX M 5500 XT: RX M 5500 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 8 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 84 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1630 better than the RX M 5500 XT?
RX M 5500 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1630 and the RX M 5500 XT?
RX M 5500 XT averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 84W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1630 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.