RTX 4060 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RTX 4060 | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 6,044 | 4,500 | +34.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 60 | 65 | -7.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 36 | 38 | -5.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 20 | 15 | +33.3% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 102 | +118.8% |
| TDP (W) | 115 | 5 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 6.0 | 1.5 | +300.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 11 | 25 | -56.0% |
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 5% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
Verdict: RTX 4060 or BXT-32-1024 MC4?
RTX 4060 advantages
- 4K gaming (+25%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+26%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
- AI image generation (+75%)
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+5%)
- Local LLM inference (+56%)
- Power efficiency (+96%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RTX 4060 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 4060 if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
RTX 4060 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: which should you choose?
RTX 4060 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p; launched at $299.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4060 vs BXT-32-1024 MC4: BXT-32-1024 MC4 is faster for gaming. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 5% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps against 36. At 4K (20 vs 15 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4060 is quicker for AI image generation (6.0 vs 1.5 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (25 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 115 W versus 5 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RTX 4060 better than the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 5% faster.
What is the main difference between the RTX 4060 and the BXT-32-1024 MC4?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 5% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the RTX 4060 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display. Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.