BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs RTX 4060
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | BXT-32-1024 MC4 | RTX 4060 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,500 | 6,044 | -25.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 65 | 60 | +8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 38 | 36 | +5.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 15 | 20 | -25.0% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 102 | 224 | -54.3% |
| TDP (W) | 5 | 115 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 1.5 | 6.0 | -75.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 25 | 11 | +127.3% |
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 6% faster.
- BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
Verdict: BXT-32-1024 MC4 or RTX 4060?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+5%)
- Local LLM inference (+56%)
- Power efficiency (+96%)
RTX 4060 advantages
- 4K gaming (+25%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+26%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
- AI image generation (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RTX 4060 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
- Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you run local LLMs and AI inference.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs RTX 4060: which should you choose?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 — Imagination integrated graphics processor (2020, Rogue Architecture) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
RTX 4060 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2023, Ada Lovelace) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 36 fps at 1440p; launched at $299.
BXT-32-1024 MC4 vs RTX 4060: BXT-32-1024 MC4 is faster for gaming. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 6% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps against 36. At 4K (15 vs 20 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 4060 is quicker for AI image generation (6.0 vs 1.5 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (25 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 5 W versus 115 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the BXT-32-1024 MC4 better than the RTX 4060?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 6% faster.
What is the main difference between the BXT-32-1024 MC4 and the RTX 4060?
BXT-32-1024 MC4 averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 36 fps — about 6% faster. BXT-32-1024 MC4 draws less power (5W vs 115W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the BXT-32-1024 MC4 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 4060 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.