Graphics Card Comparison

R9 Fury vs GTX Titan Z Max-Q

Verdict
R9 Fury vs GTX Titan Z Max-Q: R9 Fury is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricR9 FuryGTX Titan Z Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,5092,471+1.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3636
Avg FPS @ 1440p2020
Avg FPS @ 4K1111
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)7.27.1+1.6%
VRAM4 GB HBM12 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)512672-23.8%
TDP (W)275168
  • R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster.
  • GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

Verdict: R9 Fury or GTX Titan Z Max-Q?

Our recommendation
GTX Titan Z Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

R9 Fury advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

GTX Titan Z Max-Q advantages

  • Video memory (+67%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+24%)
  • Power efficiency (+39%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

R9 Fury vs GTX Titan Z Max-Q: which should you choose?

R9 Fury — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $549.

GTX Titan Z Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Kepler) with 12 GB of GDDR5, averaging 20 fps at 1440p.

R9 Fury vs GTX Titan Z Max-Q: R9 Fury is faster for gaming. R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster. GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 Fury averages 20 fps against 20. At 4K (11 vs 11 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 275 W versus 168 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the R9 Fury better than the GTX Titan Z Max-Q?

GTX Titan Z Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the R9 Fury and the GTX Titan Z Max-Q?

R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster. GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
R9 Fury profile → GTX Titan Z Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons