Graphics Card Comparison

GTX Titan Z Max-Q vs R9 Fury

Verdict
GTX Titan Z Max-Q vs R9 Fury: GTX Titan Z Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX Titan Z Max-QR9 FuryDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,4712,509-1.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3636
Avg FPS @ 1440p2020
Avg FPS @ 4K1111
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)7.17.2-1.5%
VRAM12 GB GDDR54 GB HBM
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)672512+31.3%
TDP (W)168275
  • GTX Titan Z Max-Q averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster.
  • GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

Verdict: GTX Titan Z Max-Q or R9 Fury?

Our recommendation
GTX Titan Z Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX Titan Z Max-Q advantages

  • Video memory (+67%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+24%)
  • Power efficiency (+39%)

R9 Fury advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

GTX Titan Z Max-Q vs R9 Fury: which should you choose?

GTX Titan Z Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Kepler) with 12 GB of GDDR5, averaging 20 fps at 1440p.

R9 Fury — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $549.

GTX Titan Z Max-Q vs R9 Fury: GTX Titan Z Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX Titan Z Max-Q averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster. GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX Titan Z Max-Q averages 20 fps against 20. At 4K (11 vs 11 fps) VRAM (12GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 168 W versus 275 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX Titan Z Max-Q better than the R9 Fury?

GTX Titan Z Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX Titan Z Max-Q averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX Titan Z Max-Q and the R9 Fury?

GTX Titan Z Max-Q averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 0% faster. GTX Titan Z Max-Q draws less power (168W vs 275W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX Titan Z Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX Titan Z Max-Q profile → R9 Fury profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons