Quadro RTX 4000 vs Arc A570M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro RTX 4000 | Arc A570M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,492 | 2,234 | +11.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 36 | 34 | +5.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 20 | 19 | +5.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 11 | 10 | +10.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 7.1 | 5.3 | +33.8% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 224 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 160 | 75 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.8 | 0.8 | +250.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 11 | +100.0% |
- Quadro RTX 4000 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster.
- Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 160W).
Verdict: Quadro RTX 4000 or Arc A570M?
Quadro RTX 4000 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+5%)
- 4K gaming (+9%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+10%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- AI image generation (+71%)
- Local LLM inference (+50%)
Arc A570M advantages
- Power efficiency (+53%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?
Quadro RTX 4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $900.
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Arc A570M: Quadro RTX 4000 is faster for gaming. Quadro RTX 4000 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 160W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro RTX 4000 averages 20 fps against 19. At 4K (11 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Quadro RTX 4000 is quicker for AI image generation (2.8 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (22 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 160 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro RTX 4000 better than the Arc A570M?
Quadro RTX 4000 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Quadro RTX 4000 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro RTX 4000 and the Arc A570M?
Quadro RTX 4000 averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 5% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 160W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.