Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 5090
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 5090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,492 | 40,000 | -93.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 36 | 286 | -87.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 20 | 183 | -89.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 11 | 105 | -89.5% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 7.1 | 104.8 | -93.2% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR6 | 32 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 1,792 | -75.0% |
| TDP (W) | 160 | 575 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 2.8 | 41.9 | -93.3% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 22 | 143 | -84.6% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $900 | $1,999 | -55.0% |
- RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 89% faster.
- Quadro RTX 4000 draws less power (160W vs 575W).
Verdict: Quadro RTX 4000 or RTX 5090?
Quadro RTX 4000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+72%)
- Affordability (+55%)
RTX 5090 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+89%)
- 4K gaming (+90%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+94%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
- AI image generation (+93%)
- Local LLM inference (+85%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
RTX 5090 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 5090: which should you choose?
Quadro RTX 4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $900.
RTX 5090 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 32 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 89% faster. Quadro RTX 4000 draws less power (160W vs 575W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 averages 183 fps against 20. At 4K (11 vs 105 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 32GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5090 is quicker for AI image generation (41.9 vs 2.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (143 vs 22 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 160 W versus 575 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $900 vs $1,999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro RTX 4000 better than the RTX 5090?
RTX 5090 takes the overall edge, though Quadro RTX 4000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 89% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro RTX 4000 and the RTX 5090?
RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 89% faster. Quadro RTX 4000 draws less power (160W vs 575W).
Which is better value?
RTX 5090 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro RTX 4000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.