Graphics Card Comparison

Quadro M2000 vs GTX 780 Ti Max-Q

Verdict
Quadro M2000 vs GTX 780 Ti Max-Q: GTX 780 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricQuadro M2000GTX 780 Ti Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy6261,309-52.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2428-14.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1215-20.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K68-25.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.83.7-52.1%
VRAM4 GB GDDR53 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112336-66.7%
TDP (W)75112
  • GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 20% faster.
  • Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

Verdict: Quadro M2000 or GTX 780 Ti Max-Q?

Our recommendation
GTX 780 Ti Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Quadro M2000 advantages

  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Power efficiency (+33%)

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+20%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+52%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+67%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Quadro M2000 vs GTX 780 Ti Max-Q: which should you choose?

Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 vs GTX 780 Ti Max-Q: GTX 780 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 20% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 8 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 112 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Quadro M2000 better than the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q?

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 20% faster.

What is the main difference between the Quadro M2000 and the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q?

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 20% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Quadro M2000 profile → GTX 780 Ti Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons