Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro M2000

Verdict
GTX 780 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro M2000: GTX 780 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 780 Ti Max-QQuadro M2000Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,309626+109.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2824+16.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1512+25.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K86+33.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.71.8+108.9%
VRAM3 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)336112+200.0%
TDP (W)11275
  • GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster.
  • Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

Verdict: GTX 780 Ti Max-Q or Quadro M2000?

Our recommendation
GTX 780 Ti Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+20%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+52%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+67%)

Quadro M2000 advantages

  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Power efficiency (+33%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro M2000: which should you choose?

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.

Quadro M2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $550.

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q vs Quadro M2000: GTX 780 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps against 12. At 4K (8 vs 6 fps) VRAM (3GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 112 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q better than the Quadro M2000?

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Quadro M2000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q and the Quadro M2000?

GTX 780 Ti Max-Q averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 25% faster. Quadro M2000 draws less power (75W vs 112W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 780 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro M2000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 780 Ti Max-Q profile → Quadro M2000 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons