Pro WX 4100 vs GTX 780 Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 4100 | GTX 780 Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 861 | 1,015 | -15.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 26 | -3.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 14 | -7.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 7 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 | 2.9 | -15.2% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 3 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 336 | -66.7% |
| TDP (W) | 50 | 112 | — |
- GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.
- Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
Verdict: Pro WX 4100 or GTX 780 Max-Q?
Pro WX 4100 advantages
- Video memory (+25%)
- Power efficiency (+55%)
GTX 780 Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+15%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Pro WX 4100 vs GTX 780 Max-Q: which should you choose?
Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
GTX 780 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Pro WX 4100 vs GTX 780 Max-Q: GTX 780 Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 50 W versus 112 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 4100 better than the GTX 780 Max-Q?
GTX 780 Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Pro WX 4100 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 4100 and the GTX 780 Max-Q?
GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.