GTX 780 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 780 Max-Q | Pro WX 4100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,015 | 861 | +17.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 26 | 25 | +4.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 13 | +7.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 7 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.9 | 2.5 | +17.9% |
| VRAM | 3 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 112 | +200.0% |
| TDP (W) | 112 | 50 | — |
- GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster.
- Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
Verdict: GTX 780 Max-Q or Pro WX 4100?
GTX 780 Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+15%)
- Memory bandwidth (+67%)
Pro WX 4100 advantages
- Video memory (+25%)
- Power efficiency (+55%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
GTX 780 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: which should you choose?
GTX 780 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
GTX 780 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: GTX 780 Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 7 fps) VRAM (3GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 112 W versus 50 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 780 Max-Q better than the Pro WX 4100?
GTX 780 Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Pro WX 4100 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 780 Max-Q and the Pro WX 4100?
GTX 780 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 112W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.