Graphics Card Comparison

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs Arc A380

Verdict
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs Arc A380: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricNVIDIA Titan RTX Max-QArc A380Difference
3DMark Time Spy3,9971,721+132.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4631+48.4%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2717+58.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K149+55.6%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)11.44.1+178.5%
VRAM24 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)672168+300.0%
TDP (W)12675
  • NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 59% faster.
  • Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

Verdict: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q or Arc A380?

Our recommendation
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+37%)
  • 4K gaming (+36%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+75%)

Arc A380 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+40%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs Arc A380: which should you choose?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.

Arc A380 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q vs Arc A380: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 59% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps against 17. At 4K (14 vs 9 fps) VRAM (24GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 126 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q better than the Arc A380?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 59% faster.

What is the main difference between the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q and the Arc A380?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 59% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q profile → Arc A380 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons