Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A380 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q

Verdict
Arc A380 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A380NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,7213,997-56.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3146-32.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1727-37.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K914-35.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.111.4-64.1%
VRAM6 GB GDDR624 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168672-75.0%
TDP (W)75126
  • NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 37% faster.
  • Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

Verdict: Arc A380 or NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

Our recommendation
NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A380 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+40%)

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+37%)
  • 4K gaming (+36%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+57%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+75%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Arc A380 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: which should you choose?

Arc A380 — Intel desktop graphics card (2022, Alchemist) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 24 GB of GDDR6, averaging 27 fps at 1440p.

Arc A380 vs NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q: NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is faster for gaming. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 37% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps against 17. At 4K (9 vs 14 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 126 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A380 better than the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 37% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A380 and the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q?

NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q averages 27 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 37% faster. Arc A380 draws less power (75W vs 126W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A380 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A380 profile → NVIDIA Titan RTX Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons