M2 Ultra GPU vs Arc A570M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | M2 Ultra GPU | Arc A570M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 22,100 | 2,234 | +889.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 175 | 34 | +414.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 125 | 19 | +557.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 68 | 10 | +580.0% |
| VRAM | 192 GB Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 800 | 224 | +257.1% |
| TDP (W) | 100 | 75 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 9.8 | 0.8 | +1,125.0% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 55 | 11 | +400.0% |
- M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 558% faster.
- Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).
Verdict: M2 Ultra GPU or Arc A570M?
M2 Ultra GPU advantages
- 1440p gaming (+85%)
- 4K gaming (+85%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
- Video memory (+96%)
- Memory bandwidth (+72%)
- AI image generation (+92%)
- Local LLM inference (+80%)
Arc A570M advantages
- Power efficiency (+25%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the M2 Ultra GPU if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the M2 Ultra GPU if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
M2 Ultra GPU vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?
M2 Ultra GPU — Apple integrated graphics processor (2023, Rhodes) with 192 GB of Shared, averaging 125 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
M2 Ultra GPU vs Arc A570M: M2 Ultra GPU is faster for gaming. M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 558% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps against 19. At 4K (68 vs 10 fps) VRAM (192GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the M2 Ultra GPU is quicker for AI image generation (9.8 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (55 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 100 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the M2 Ultra GPU better than the Arc A570M?
M2 Ultra GPU is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 558% faster.
What is the main difference between the M2 Ultra GPU and the Arc A570M?
M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 558% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the M2 Ultra GPU if you game at 1440p. Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.