Graphics Card Comparison

Arc A570M vs M2 Ultra GPU

Verdict
Arc A570M vs M2 Ultra GPU: M2 Ultra GPU is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricArc A570MM2 Ultra GPUDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,23422,100-89.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p34175-80.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p19125-84.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K1068-85.3%
VRAM8 GB GDDR6192 GB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224800-72.0%
TDP (W)75100
Stable Diffusion (it/s)0.89.8-91.8%
LLM inference (tokens/s)1155-80.0%
  • M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 85% faster.
  • Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).

Verdict: Arc A570M or M2 Ultra GPU?

Our recommendation
M2 Ultra GPU is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Arc A570M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+25%)

M2 Ultra GPU advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+85%)
  • 4K gaming (+85%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
  • Video memory (+96%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+72%)
  • AI image generation (+92%)
  • Local LLM inference (+80%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the M2 Ultra GPU if you game at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs M2 Ultra GPU: which should you choose?

Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.

M2 Ultra GPU — Apple integrated graphics processor (2023, Rhodes) with 192 GB of Shared, averaging 125 fps at 1440p.

Arc A570M vs M2 Ultra GPU: M2 Ultra GPU is faster for gaming. M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 85% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 68 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 192GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

AI and creator workloads

Beyond gaming, the M2 Ultra GPU is quicker for AI image generation (9.8 vs 0.8 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (55 vs 11 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.

Power and value

Board power is 75 W versus 100 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Arc A570M better than the M2 Ultra GPU?

M2 Ultra GPU is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 85% faster.

What is the main difference between the Arc A570M and the M2 Ultra GPU?

M2 Ultra GPU averages 125 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 85% faster. Arc A570M draws less power (75W vs 100W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Arc A570M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the M2 Ultra GPU if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Arc A570M profile → M2 Ultra GPU profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons