Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090 D V2
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Immortalis-G925 MC16 | RTX 5090 D V2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,100 | 40,000 | -94.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 286 | -90.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 183 | -92.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 105 | -95.2% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 24 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 171 | 1,344 | -87.3% |
| TDP (W) | 10 | 575 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.6 | 41.9 | -98.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 10 | 107 | -90.7% |
- RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster.
- Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
Verdict: Immortalis-G925 MC16 or RTX 5090 D V2?
Immortalis-G925 MC16 advantages
- Power efficiency (+98%)
RTX 5090 D V2 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+92%)
- 4K gaming (+95%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+95%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+87%)
- AI image generation (+99%)
- Local LLM inference (+91%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5090 D V2 if you game at 1440p.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090 D V2: which should you choose?
Immortalis-G925 MC16 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2024, 5th Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
RTX 5090 D V2 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 24 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $2,299.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090 D V2: RTX 5090 D V2 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps against 14. At 4K (5 vs 105 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 24GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5090 D V2 is quicker for AI image generation (41.9 vs 0.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (107 vs 10 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 10 W versus 575 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Immortalis-G925 MC16 better than the RTX 5090 D V2?
RTX 5090 D V2 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster.
What is the main difference between the Immortalis-G925 MC16 and the RTX 5090 D V2?
RTX 5090 D V2 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5090 D V2 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.