Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Immortalis-G925 MC16 | RTX 5090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,100 | 40,000 | -94.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 286 | -90.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 183 | -92.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 105 | -95.2% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 32 GB GDDR7 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 171 | 1,792 | -90.5% |
| TDP (W) | 10 | 575 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.6 | 41.9 | -98.6% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 10 | 143 | -93.0% |
- RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster.
- Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
Verdict: Immortalis-G925 MC16 or RTX 5090?
Immortalis-G925 MC16 advantages
- Power efficiency (+98%)
RTX 5090 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+92%)
- 4K gaming (+95%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+95%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+90%)
- AI image generation (+99%)
- Local LLM inference (+93%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090: which should you choose?
Immortalis-G925 MC16 — ARM integrated graphics processor (2024, 5th Gen) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
RTX 5090 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 32 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.
Immortalis-G925 MC16 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 averages 183 fps against 14. At 4K (5 vs 105 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 32GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 5090 is quicker for AI image generation (41.9 vs 0.6 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (143 vs 10 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 10 W versus 575 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Immortalis-G925 MC16 better than the RTX 5090?
RTX 5090 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster.
What is the main difference between the Immortalis-G925 MC16 and the RTX 5090?
RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 92% faster. Immortalis-G925 MC16 draws less power (10W vs 575W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Immortalis-G925 MC16 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.