NIO ET7 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | NIO ET7 | Mercedes-Benz EQS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 653 | 360 | +81.4% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 850 | 568 | +49.6% |
| Energy use (kWh/100km) | 16.2 | 15.1 | +7.3% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (C-NCAP) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Electric | — |
| Transmission | Single-speed | Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $73,640 | $119,016 | -38.1% |
- NIO ET7 makes about 81% more power (653 vs 360 hp).
- Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more efficient EV, using 15.1 kWh/100km against 16.2.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (China and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: ET7 or EQS?
NIO ET7 advantages
- Engine power (+45%)
- Pulling torque (+33%)
- Affordability (+38%)
Mercedes-Benz EQS advantages
- Energy efficiency (+7%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the NIO ET7 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
- Choose the NIO ET7 if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
NIO ET7 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
NIO ET7 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: which should you choose?
NIO ET7 (2021 Premier Edition 100kWh) — electric sedan with 653 hp and 850 Nm, rated at 16.2 kWh/100km, 5-star C-NCAP safety; priced near $73,640 in the China market.
Mercedes-Benz EQS (2024 EQS 450+ Facelift) — electric sedan with 360 hp and 568 Nm, rated at 15.1 kWh/100km, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $119,016 in the Germany market.
NIO ET7 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS: NIO ET7 is more powerful. NIO ET7 makes about 81% more power (653 vs 360 hp). Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more efficient EV, using 15.1 kWh/100km against 16.2.
Performance
The NIO ET7 is the more powerful, at 653 hp against 360 hp, with 850 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a single-speed transmission.
Running costs
The Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more efficient EV, drawing 15.1 kWh/100km against 16.2 — lower charging costs and, on the same battery, more range.
Safety
NIO ET7 is rated 5 stars by C-NCAP and Mercedes-Benz EQS 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The NIO ET7 lists lower at about $73,640 (USD-converted from the China market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the NIO ET7 better than the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
NIO ET7 takes the overall edge, though Mercedes-Benz EQS wins in specific areas worth weighing. NIO ET7 makes about 81% more power (653 vs 360 hp).
What is the main difference between the NIO ET7 and the Mercedes-Benz EQS?
NIO ET7 makes about 81% more power (653 vs 360 hp). Mercedes-Benz EQS is the more efficient EV, using 15.1 kWh/100km against 16.2.
Which is better value?
NIO ET7 delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the NIO ET7 if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Mercedes-Benz EQS if you want the lowest charging costs per km.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.