Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi A4
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Audi A4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 480 | 163 | +194.5% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 949 | 380 | +149.7% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (NHTSA) | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | — |
| Fuel type | Electric | Diesel | — |
| Transmission | 1-Speed Automatic | DSG | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $60,500 | $45,468 | +33.1% |
- Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 194% more power (480 vs 163 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (US and Germany); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: Mustang Mach-E or A4?
Ford Mustang Mach-E advantages
- Engine power (+66%)
- Pulling torque (+60%)
Audi A4 advantages
- Affordability (+25%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
- Choose the Audi A4 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you tow, carry loads or drive hilly roads.
Value for money
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi A4: which should you choose?
Ford Mustang Mach-E (2026 GT Extended AWD) — electric suv with 480 hp and 949 Nm, rated at 24.9 kWh/100km, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $60,500 in the US market.
Audi A4 (2023 35 TDI) — diesel sedan with 163 hp and 380 Nm, rated at 20.8 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $45,468 in the Germany market.
Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Audi A4: Ford Mustang Mach-E is more powerful. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 194% more power (480 vs 163 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more powerful, at 480 hp against 163 hp, with 949 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a 1-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Electric vs Diesel), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Ford Mustang Mach-E is rated 5 stars by NHTSA and Audi A4 5 stars by Euro NCAP. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Audi A4 lists lower at about $45,468 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Ford Mustang Mach-E better than the Audi A4?
Ford Mustang Mach-E takes the overall edge, though Audi A4 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 194% more power (480 vs 163 hp).
What is the main difference between the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Audi A4?
Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 194% more power (480 vs 163 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Electric vs Diesel), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence. Choose the Audi A4 if you want the lower upfront cost.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.