Audi A4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Audi A4 | Ford Mustang Mach-E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max power (hp) | 163 | 480 | -66.0% |
| Max torque (Nm) | 380 | 949 | -60.0% |
| NCAP safety | 5★ (Euro NCAP) | 5★ (NHTSA) | — |
| Fuel type | Diesel | Electric | — |
| Transmission | DSG | 1-Speed Automatic | — |
| Price (USD est.) | $45,468 | $60,500 | -24.8% |
- Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 66% more power (480 vs 163 hp).
- Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
- Prices are converted to USD from their home markets (Germany and US); taxes and availability differ by country.
Verdict: A4 or Mustang Mach-E?
Audi A4 advantages
- Affordability (+25%)
Ford Mustang Mach-E advantages
- Engine power (+66%)
- Pulling torque (+60%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Audi A4 if you want the lower upfront cost.
- Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Value for money
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Audi A4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: which should you choose?
Audi A4 (2023 35 TDI) — diesel sedan with 163 hp and 380 Nm, rated at 20.8 km/L, 5-star Euro NCAP safety; priced near $45,468 in the Germany market.
Ford Mustang Mach-E (2026 GT Extended AWD) — electric suv with 480 hp and 949 Nm, rated at 24.9 kWh/100km, 5-star NHTSA safety; priced near $60,500 in the US market.
Audi A4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Ford Mustang Mach-E is more powerful. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 66% more power (480 vs 163 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Performance
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is the more powerful, at 480 hp against 163 hp, with 949 Nm of torque on tap. Its electric drivetrain pairs with a 1-speed automatic transmission.
Running costs
These cars use different energy types (Diesel vs Electric), so compare cost per kilometre at your local fuel and electricity prices rather than a single economy number.
Safety
Audi A4 is rated 5 stars by Euro NCAP and Ford Mustang Mach-E 5 stars by NHTSA. Different NCAP programmes use different protocols, so same-programme comparisons are the most reliable.
Price and value
The Audi A4 lists lower at about $45,468 (USD-converted from the Germany market). Factor in insurance, fuel or charging, taxes and resale — not just the sticker price.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the car comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Audi A4 better than the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Ford Mustang Mach-E takes the overall edge, though Audi A4 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 66% more power (480 vs 163 hp).
What is the main difference between the Audi A4 and the Ford Mustang Mach-E?
Ford Mustang Mach-E makes about 66% more power (480 vs 163 hp). Their economy figures use different measures (Diesel vs Electric), so compare running costs in your local fuel and electricity prices rather than head-to-head.
Which is better value?
Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers more horsepower per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Audi A4 if you want the lower upfront cost. Choose the Ford Mustang Mach-E if you want stronger performance and overtaking confidence.
Methodology
Cars are compared on manufacturer-rated maximum power and torque, certified fuel economy (km/L, converted from each market's test cycle: EPA, WLTP, CLTC, JC08/WLTC, ARAI) or EV energy use (kWh/100km), official NCAP crash-test ratings from the model's home-market programme, and list prices converted to USD at recent exchange rates. Each model shows its newest listed year and its highest-priority market trim. Test cycles differ between regions, so cross-market economy figures are directional rather than exact; prices exclude local taxes and incentives.