Smartphone Comparison

Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Verdict
Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the faster phone

Head-to-head specifications

MetricVivo X90 Pro+Samsung Galaxy S26 UltraDifference
AnTuTu v10 score1,557,5163,515,964-55.7%
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen 2Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display6.8" 120 Hz6.9" 120 Hz
Battery (mAh)4,7005,200-9.6%
Rear cameras50.3+64+50+48 MP200+50+50+50 MP
Front camera (MP)3224
RAM / storage (base)12 GB / 256 GB16 GB / 256 GB
Max configuration12 GB / 512 GB24 GB / 1024 GB
Weight (g)221215+2.8%
Connectivity / unlock5G · Under-display5G · Under-display
Launch price (USD)$1,099–$1,199$1,349–$1,649-18.5%
  • Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 56% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).
  • Vivo X90 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Verdict: X90 Pro+ or Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Our recommendation
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra takes the overall edge, though Vivo X90 Pro+ wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Vivo X90 Pro+ advantages

  • Affordability (+19%)

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra advantages

  • Raw performance (+56%)
  • Battery capacity (+10%)
  • Camera resolution (+68%)
  • Memory (+25%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Vivo X90 Pro+ if you want the best value for money.
  • Choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.

Value for money

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: which should you choose?

Vivo X90 Pro+ — Vivo Android 13 smartphone (2022) with a 6.78-inch 120 Hz LTPO4 AMOLED, Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, 4700 mAh battery and 64MP main camera, scoring about 1,557,516 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $1,099.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — Samsung Android 16 smartphone (2026) with a 6.9-inch 120 Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 5200 mAh battery and 200MP main camera, scoring about 3,515,964 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $1,349.

Vivo X90 Pro+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the faster phone. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 56% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5). Vivo X90 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Performance and everyday use

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is the faster device on raw benchmarks (3,515,964 vs 1,557,516 on AnTuTu v10), running the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 against the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.

Display and battery

Vivo X90 Pro+ carries a 6.8-inch 120 Hz LTPO4 AMOLED against a 6.9-inch 120 Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X on the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Batteries are 4,700 and 5,200 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.

Cameras, storage and price

Rear arrays are 50.3+64+50+48 MP versus 200+50+50+50 MP, with 32 MP and 24 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 12 GB / 256 GB and 16 GB / 256 GB. The Vivo X90 Pro+ is the more affordable at about $1,099 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Vivo X90 Pro+ better than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra takes the overall edge, though Vivo X90 Pro+ wins in specific areas worth weighing. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 56% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).

What is the main difference between the Vivo X90 Pro+ and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 56% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5). Vivo X90 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Which is better value?

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Vivo X90 Pro+ if you want the best value for money. Choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.

Methodology

Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Vivo X90 Pro+ profile → Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons