Smartphone Comparison

Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra

Verdict
Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra: Xiaomi 16 Ultra is the faster phone

Head-to-head specifications

MetricVivo X60 Pro+Xiaomi 16 UltraDifference
AnTuTu v10 score915,8523,593,401-74.5%
ChipsetSnapdragon 888Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Display6.6" 120 Hz6.7" 120 Hz
Battery (mAh)4,2006,200-32.3%
Rear cameras50+8+32+48 MP50+200+50+50 MP
Front camera (MP)3232
RAM / storage (base)8 GB / 128 GB16 GB / 256 GB
Max configuration12 GB / 256 GB24 GB / 1024 GB
Weight (g)191222-14.0%
Connectivity / unlock5G · Under-display5G · Under-display
Launch price (USD)$899–$979$1,349–$1,649-33.4%
  • Xiaomi 16 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 75% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).
  • Vivo X60 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 5 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Verdict: X60 Pro+ or Xiaomi 16 Ultra?

Our recommendation
Xiaomi 16 Ultra takes the overall edge, though Vivo X60 Pro+ wins in specific areas worth weighing.

Vivo X60 Pro+ advantages

  • Lightness (+14%)
  • Affordability (+33%)

Xiaomi 16 Ultra advantages

  • Raw performance (+75%)
  • Battery capacity (+32%)
  • Camera resolution (+75%)
  • Memory (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Vivo X60 Pro+ if you want a lighter phone for one-handed use.
  • Choose the Xiaomi 16 Ultra if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.
  • Choose the Vivo X60 Pro+ if you want the best value for money.

Value for money

Xiaomi 16 Ultra delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra: which should you choose?

Vivo X60 Pro+ — Vivo Android 11 smartphone (2021) with a 6.56-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, Snapdragon 888, 4200 mAh battery and 50MP main camera, scoring about 915,852 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $899.

Xiaomi 16 Ultra — Xiaomi Android 16 smartphone (2026) with a 6.73-inch 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED, Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, 6200 mAh battery and 200MP main camera, scoring about 3,593,401 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $1,349.

Vivo X60 Pro+ vs Xiaomi 16 Ultra: Xiaomi 16 Ultra is the faster phone. Xiaomi 16 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 75% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5). Vivo X60 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 5 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Performance and everyday use

The Xiaomi 16 Ultra is the faster device on raw benchmarks (3,593,401 vs 915,852 on AnTuTu v10), running the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 against the Snapdragon 888. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.

Display and battery

Vivo X60 Pro+ carries a 6.6-inch 120 Hz AMOLED against a 6.7-inch 120 Hz LTPO AMOLED on the Xiaomi 16 Ultra. Batteries are 4,200 and 6,200 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.

Cameras, storage and price

Rear arrays are 50+8+32+48 MP versus 50+200+50+50 MP, with 32 MP and 32 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 8 GB / 128 GB and 16 GB / 256 GB. The Vivo X60 Pro+ is the more affordable at about $899 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Vivo X60 Pro+ better than the Xiaomi 16 Ultra?

Xiaomi 16 Ultra takes the overall edge, though Vivo X60 Pro+ wins in specific areas worth weighing. Xiaomi 16 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 75% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5).

What is the main difference between the Vivo X60 Pro+ and the Xiaomi 16 Ultra?

Xiaomi 16 Ultra leads on raw performance by about 75% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 888 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5). Vivo X60 Pro+ is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 5 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Which is better value?

Xiaomi 16 Ultra delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Vivo X60 Pro+ if you want a lighter phone for one-handed use. Choose the Xiaomi 16 Ultra if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.

Methodology

Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Vivo X60 Pro+ profile → Xiaomi 16 Ultra profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons