Smartphone Comparison

Motorola Moto G85 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20+

Verdict
Motorola Moto G85 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20+: Samsung Galaxy S20+ is the faster phone

Head-to-head specifications

MetricMotorola Moto G85 5GSamsung Galaxy S20+Difference
AnTuTu v10 score485,000737,285-34.2%
ChipsetSnapdragon 6s Gen 3Exynos 990
Display6.7" 120 Hz6.7" 120 Hz
Battery (mAh)5,0004,500+11.1%
Rear cameras50+8 MP12+64+12+0.3 MP
Front camera (MP)3210
RAM / storage (base)8 GB / 128 GB8 GB / 128 GB
Max configuration12 GB / 256 GB12 GB / 512 GB
Weight (g)173186-7.0%
Connectivity / unlock5G · Under-display5G · Under-display
Launch price (USD)$299–$339$1,199–$1,399-75.1%
  • Samsung Galaxy S20+ leads on raw performance by about 34% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Exynos 990).
  • Motorola Moto G85 5G is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Verdict: Moto G85 5G or Galaxy S20+?

Our recommendation
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay.

Motorola Moto G85 5G advantages

  • Battery capacity (+10%)
  • Lightness (+7%)
  • Affordability (+75%)

Samsung Galaxy S20+ advantages

  • Raw performance (+34%)
  • Camera resolution (+22%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Motorola Moto G85 5G if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life.
  • Choose the Samsung Galaxy S20+ if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.
  • Choose the Motorola Moto G85 5G if you want a lighter phone for one-handed use.

Value for money

Motorola Moto G85 5G delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Motorola Moto G85 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20+: which should you choose?

Motorola Moto G85 5G — Motorola N/A smartphone (2024) with a 6.67-inch 120 Hz P-OLED, Snapdragon 6s Gen 3, 5000 mAh battery and 50MP main camera, scoring about 485,000 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $299.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ — Samsung Android 10 smartphone (2020) with a 6.7-inch 120 Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X, Exynos 990, 4500 mAh battery and 64MP main camera, scoring about 737,285 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $1,199.

Motorola Moto G85 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S20+: Samsung Galaxy S20+ is the faster phone. Samsung Galaxy S20+ leads on raw performance by about 34% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Exynos 990). Motorola Moto G85 5G is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Performance and everyday use

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ is the faster device on raw benchmarks (737,285 vs 485,000 on AnTuTu v10), running the Exynos 990 against the Snapdragon 6s Gen 3. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.

Display and battery

Motorola Moto G85 5G carries a 6.7-inch 120 Hz P-OLED against a 6.7-inch 120 Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X on the Samsung Galaxy S20+. Batteries are 5,000 and 4,500 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.

Cameras, storage and price

Rear arrays are 50+8 MP versus 12+64+12+0.3 MP, with 32 MP and 10 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 8 GB / 128 GB and 8 GB / 128 GB. The Motorola Moto G85 5G is the more affordable at about $299 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Motorola Moto G85 5G better than the Samsung Galaxy S20+?

These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Samsung Galaxy S20+ leads on raw performance by about 34% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Exynos 990).

What is the main difference between the Motorola Moto G85 5G and the Samsung Galaxy S20+?

Samsung Galaxy S20+ leads on raw performance by about 34% on AnTuTu v10 (Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Exynos 990). Motorola Moto G85 5G is the cheaper option at launch pricing, though these phones launched 4 years apart — street prices will differ from launch MSRPs.

Which is better value?

Motorola Moto G85 5G delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the Motorola Moto G85 5G if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life. Choose the Samsung Galaxy S20+ if you game or want the most headroom for years of updates.

Methodology

Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Motorola Moto G85 5G profile → Samsung Galaxy S20+ profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons