iPhone 15 Pro vs Vivo V40 Pro
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | iPhone 15 Pro | Vivo V40 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu v10 score | 1,533,780 | 1,489,987 | +2.9% |
| Chipset | Apple A17 Pro | Dimensity 9200+ | — |
| Display | 6.1" 120 Hz | 6.8" 120 Hz | — |
| Battery (mAh) | 3,274 | 5,500 | -40.5% |
| Rear cameras | 48+12+12+LiDAR MP | 50+50+50 MP | — |
| Front camera (MP) | 12 | 50 | — |
| RAM / storage (base) | 8 GB / 128 GB | 8 GB / 256 GB | — |
| Max configuration | 8 GB / 1024 GB | 12 GB / 512 GB | — |
| Weight (g) | 187 | 192 | -2.6% |
| Connectivity / unlock | 5G · No - Face ID | 5G · Under-display | — |
| Launch price (USD) | $999–$1,499 | $549–$629 | +82.0% |
- iPhone 15 Pro leads on raw performance by about 3% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A17 Pro vs Dimensity 9200+).
- Vivo V40 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Verdict: iPhone 15 Pro or V40 Pro?
iPhone 15 Pro advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Vivo V40 Pro advantages
- Battery capacity (+40%)
- Camera resolution (+4%)
- Affordability (+45%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Vivo V40 Pro if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life.
Value for money
Vivo V40 Pro delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
iPhone 15 Pro vs Vivo V40 Pro: which should you choose?
iPhone 15 Pro — Apple iOS 17 smartphone (2023) with a 6.1-inch 120 Hz Super Retina XDR OLED, Apple A17 Pro, 3274 mAh battery and 48MP main camera, scoring about 1,533,780 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $999.
Vivo V40 Pro — Vivo Android 14 smartphone (2024) with a 6.78-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, Dimensity 9200+, 5500 mAh battery and 50MP main camera, scoring about 1,489,987 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $549.
iPhone 15 Pro vs Vivo V40 Pro: iPhone 15 Pro is the faster phone. iPhone 15 Pro leads on raw performance by about 3% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A17 Pro vs Dimensity 9200+). Vivo V40 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Performance and everyday use
The iPhone 15 Pro is the faster device on raw benchmarks (1,533,780 vs 1,489,987 on AnTuTu v10), running the Apple A17 Pro against the Dimensity 9200+. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.
Display and battery
iPhone 15 Pro carries a 6.1-inch 120 Hz Super Retina XDR OLED against a 6.8-inch 120 Hz AMOLED on the Vivo V40 Pro. Batteries are 3,274 and 5,500 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.
Cameras, storage and price
Rear arrays are 48+12+12+LiDAR MP versus 50+50+50 MP, with 12 MP and 50 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 8 GB / 128 GB and 8 GB / 256 GB. The Vivo V40 Pro is the more affordable at about $549 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the iPhone 15 Pro better than the Vivo V40 Pro?
Vivo V40 Pro is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. iPhone 15 Pro leads on raw performance by about 3% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A17 Pro vs Dimensity 9200+).
What is the main difference between the iPhone 15 Pro and the Vivo V40 Pro?
iPhone 15 Pro leads on raw performance by about 3% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A17 Pro vs Dimensity 9200+). Vivo V40 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Which is better value?
Vivo V40 Pro delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Vivo V40 Pro if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life.
Methodology
Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.