iPhone 14 Plus vs POCO F5 Pro
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | iPhone 14 Plus | POCO F5 Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AnTuTu v10 score | 1,299,090 | 1,299,617 | — |
| Chipset | Apple A15 Bionic | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | — |
| Display | 6.7" 60 Hz | 6.7" 120 Hz | — |
| Battery (mAh) | 4,325 | 5,160 | -16.2% |
| Rear cameras | 12+12 MP | 64+8+2 MP | — |
| Front camera (MP) | 12 | 16 | — |
| RAM / storage (base) | 6 GB / 128 GB | 8 GB / 256 GB | — |
| Max configuration | 6 GB / 512 GB | 12 GB / 512 GB | — |
| Weight (g) | 203 | 204 | -0.5% |
| Connectivity / unlock | 5G · No - Face ID | 5G · Under-display | — |
| Launch price (USD) | $899–$1,199 | $449–$539 | +100.2% |
- POCO F5 Pro leads on raw performance by about 0% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1).
- POCO F5 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Verdict: iPhone 14 Plus or POCO F5 Pro?
iPhone 14 Plus advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
POCO F5 Pro advantages
- Battery capacity (+16%)
- Display smoothness (+50%)
- Camera resolution (+81%)
- Memory (+25%)
- Affordability (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the POCO F5 Pro if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life.
Value for money
POCO F5 Pro delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
iPhone 14 Plus vs POCO F5 Pro: which should you choose?
iPhone 14 Plus — Apple iOS 16 smartphone (2022) with a 6.7-inch 60 Hz Super Retina XDR OLED, Apple A15 Bionic, 4325 mAh battery and 12MP main camera, scoring about 1,299,090 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $899.
POCO F5 Pro — POCO Android 13 smartphone (2023) with a 6.67-inch 120 Hz AMOLED, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, 5160 mAh battery and 64MP main camera, scoring about 1,299,617 on AnTuTu v10; launched at $449.
iPhone 14 Plus vs POCO F5 Pro: POCO F5 Pro is the faster phone. POCO F5 Pro leads on raw performance by about 0% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1). POCO F5 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Performance and everyday use
The POCO F5 Pro is the faster device on raw benchmarks (1,299,617 vs 1,299,090 on AnTuTu v10), running the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 against the Apple A15 Bionic. For messaging, browsing and social apps both feel instant — the gap matters most for gaming and long-term headroom.
Display and battery
iPhone 14 Plus carries a 6.7-inch 60 Hz Super Retina XDR OLED against a 6.7-inch 120 Hz AMOLED on the POCO F5 Pro. Batteries are 4,325 and 5,160 mAh — though software tuning and chipset efficiency shape real-world endurance as much as capacity.
Cameras, storage and price
Rear arrays are 12+12 MP versus 64+8+2 MP, with 12 MP and 16 MP front cameras. Base configurations start at 6 GB / 128 GB and 8 GB / 256 GB. The POCO F5 Pro is the more affordable at about $449 launch price, which may matter more than a small spec gap.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the smartphone comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the iPhone 14 Plus better than the POCO F5 Pro?
POCO F5 Pro is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. POCO F5 Pro leads on raw performance by about 0% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1).
What is the main difference between the iPhone 14 Plus and the POCO F5 Pro?
POCO F5 Pro leads on raw performance by about 0% on AnTuTu v10 (Apple A15 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1). POCO F5 Pro is the cheaper option at launch pricing.
Which is better value?
POCO F5 Pro delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the POCO F5 Pro if you need all-day (or two-day) battery life.
Methodology
Smartphones are compared on AnTuTu v10 benchmark scores, chipset, display size and refresh rate, battery capacity, rear and front camera resolution, RAM and storage across launch variants, weight, and launch pricing (USD). Each model shows its base variant with the top-spec configuration noted where multiple variants exist. Benchmark scores reflect the listed chipset variant; real-world battery life and camera quality depend on software tuning, not just hardware numbers.