LG Gram 14 vs Razer Blade 16
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | LG Gram 14 | Razer Blade 16 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geekbench 6 multi-core | 5,300 | 16,000 | -66.9% |
| Processor | Intel Core i7-1165G7 | Intel Core Ultra 7 265H | — |
| Graphics | Intel Iris Xe Graphics | Nvidia RTX 5070 | — |
| Display | 14.0" 1920x1200 | 16.0" 2560x1600 | — |
| Battery life (h) | 15.5 | 6 | +158.3% |
| Weight (kg) | 0.99 | 2.45 | -59.6% |
| RAM / storage (base) | 16GB / 512GB | 16GB / 1024GB | — |
| Max configuration | 16GB / 512GB | 32GB / 2048GB | — |
| Operating system | Windows 10 Home | Windows 11 Home | — |
| Price (USD) | $1,399 | $3,199–$4,499 | -56.3% |
- Razer Blade 16 is about 67% faster in Geekbench 6 multi-core. LG Gram 14 lasts longer on battery (15.5h vs 6h).
- LG Gram 14 is the more portable at 0.99 kg.
Verdict: Gram 14 or Blade 16?
LG Gram 14 advantages
- Battery life (+61%)
- Portability (+60%)
- Affordability (+56%)
Razer Blade 16 advantages
- Multi-core performance (+67%)
- Screen size (+13%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the LG Gram 14 if long unplugged battery life is essential.
- Choose the Razer Blade 16 if you need maximum performance for demanding work or gaming.
- Choose the LG Gram 14 if you carry it around all day.
Value for money
Razer Blade 16 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
LG Gram 14 vs Razer Blade 16: which should you choose?
LG Gram 14 — LG ultrabook/creator laptop (2021) with the Intel Core i7-1165G7 and Intel Iris Xe Graphics, 16GB RAM, a 14-inch 1920x1200 display, 0.99 kg and about 15.5 h battery; from $1,399.
Razer Blade 16 — Razer gaming laptop (2025) with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H and Nvidia RTX 5070, 16GB RAM, a 16-inch 2560x1600 display, 2.45 kg and about 6 h battery; from $3,199.
LG Gram 14 vs Razer Blade 16: Razer Blade 16 is the faster laptop. Razer Blade 16 is about 67% faster in Geekbench 6 multi-core. LG Gram 14 lasts longer on battery (15.5h vs 6h). LG Gram 14 is the more portable at 0.99 kg.
Performance
The Razer Blade 16 is the faster machine in Geekbench 6 multi-core (16,000 vs 5,300), pairing the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with Nvidia RTX 5070. That gap matters most for video editing, compiling, 3D and gaming; for browsing and office work both feel quick. Note these serve different roles — a ultrabook/creator versus a gaming machine — so raw speed is only part of the story.
Portability and battery
The LG Gram 14 is easier to carry at 0.99 kg (vs 2.45 kg), and the LG Gram 14 lasts longer unplugged (about 15.5 h vs 6 h). For commuters and travellers these often matter more day-to-day than peak performance.
Configuration and value
Base configurations are 16 GB / 512 GB and 16 GB / 1024 GB, with higher-spec variants available. RAM, storage and display upgrades change both price and experience — compare like-for-like configurations and check current street pricing before buying.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the laptop comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the LG Gram 14 better than the Razer Blade 16?
LG Gram 14 takes the overall edge, though Razer Blade 16 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Razer Blade 16 is about 67% faster in Geekbench 6 multi-core. LG Gram 14 lasts longer on battery (15.5h vs 6h).
What is the main difference between the LG Gram 14 and the Razer Blade 16?
Razer Blade 16 is about 67% faster in Geekbench 6 multi-core. LG Gram 14 lasts longer on battery (15.5h vs 6h). LG Gram 14 is the more portable at 0.99 kg.
Which is better value?
Razer Blade 16 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the LG Gram 14 if long unplugged battery life is essential. Choose the Razer Blade 16 if you need maximum performance for demanding work or gaming.
Methodology
Laptops are compared on Geekbench 6 multi-core scores, processor and graphics hardware, display size and resolution, rated battery life, weight, RAM and storage across launch configurations, and list pricing (USD). Where a model spans several generations, the newest generation is shown. Battery figures are manufacturer or reviewer ratings under mixed use — sustained performance also depends on cooling, which benchmarks only partly capture.