Voodoo Graphics vs R9 390
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Voodoo Graphics | R9 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 MB EDO | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 0 | 448 | -99.9% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 275 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $299 | $329 | -9.1% |
- These GPUs come from different eras (1996 vs 2015), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: Voodoo Graphics or R9 390?
Voodoo Graphics advantages
- Power efficiency (+95%)
- Affordability (+9%)
R9 390 advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+100%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Voodoo Graphics if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the R9 390 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Voodoo Graphics if you want the better price for the performance.
Voodoo Graphics vs R9 390: which should you choose?
Voodoo Graphics — 3dfx desktop graphics card (1996, Voodoo 1) with 4 MB of EDO; launched at $299.
R9 390 — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 2.0) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $329.
Voodoo Graphics vs R9 390: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (1996 vs 2015), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: Voodoo Graphics (1996, Desktop) and R9 390 (2015, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
Voodoo Graphics carries 4 MB of EDO against 8 GB of GDDR5 on R9 390, with board powers of 15 W and 275 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Voodoo Graphics better than the R9 390?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. These GPUs come from different eras (1996 vs 2015), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the Voodoo Graphics and the R9 390?
These GPUs come from different eras (1996 vs 2015), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Voodoo Graphics if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the R9 390 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.