V100 SXM2 vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | V100 SXM2 | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 7.8 | 17.2 | -54.7% |
| VRAM | 16 GB HBM2 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 900 | 448 | +100.9% |
| TDP (W) | 300 | 225 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 25.0 | 2.6 | +861.5% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 95 | 35 | +171.4% |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $10,000 | $349 | +2,765.3% |
- Arc B750 offers 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 7.8. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Verdict: V100 SXM2 or Arc B750?
V100 SXM2 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- AI image generation (+90%)
- Local LLM inference (+63%)
Arc B750 advantages
- Power efficiency (+25%)
- Affordability (+97%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the V100 SXM2 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the V100 SXM2 if you run AI image generation locally.
V100 SXM2 vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
V100 SXM2 — NVIDIA server graphics card (2017, Volta) with 16 GB of HBM2; launched at $10,000.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
V100 SXM2 vs Arc B750: Arc B750 has more raw compute. Arc B750 offers 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 7.8. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: V100 SXM2 (2017, Server) and Arc B750 (2025, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
V100 SXM2 carries 16 GB of HBM2 against 16 GB of GDDR6 on Arc B750, with board powers of 300 W and 225 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the V100 SXM2 better than the Arc B750?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Arc B750 offers 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 7.8. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
What is the main difference between the V100 SXM2 and the Arc B750?
Arc B750 offers 17.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 7.8. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Which should I choose?
Choose the V100 SXM2 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the Arc B750 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.