SiS 6326 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | SiS 6326 | Radeon HD 2600 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 4 MB EDO | 262 MB GDDR3 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 0 | 22 | -98.2% |
| TDP (W) | 5 | 35 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $49 | $149 | -67.1% |
- These GPUs come from different eras (1997 vs 2007), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: SiS 6326 or Radeon HD 2600 XT?
SiS 6326 advantages
- Power efficiency (+86%)
- Affordability (+67%)
Radeon HD 2600 XT advantages
- Video memory (+98%)
- Memory bandwidth (+98%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the SiS 6326 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Radeon HD 2600 XT if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the SiS 6326 if you want the better price for the performance.
SiS 6326 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT: which should you choose?
SiS 6326 — SiS desktop graphics card (1997, SiS 1st Gen) with 4 MB of EDO; launched at $49.
Radeon HD 2600 XT — ATI desktop graphics card (2007, TeraScale 1) with 262 MB of GDDR3; launched at $149.
SiS 6326 vs Radeon HD 2600 XT: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (1997 vs 2007), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: SiS 6326 (1997, Desktop) and Radeon HD 2600 XT (2007, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
SiS 6326 carries 4 MB of EDO against 262 MB of GDDR3 on Radeon HD 2600 XT, with board powers of 5 W and 35 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the SiS 6326 better than the Radeon HD 2600 XT?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. These GPUs come from different eras (1997 vs 2007), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the SiS 6326 and the Radeon HD 2600 XT?
These GPUs come from different eras (1997 vs 2007), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the SiS 6326 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Radeon HD 2600 XT if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.