RX Vega 56 vs Quadro RTX 8000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | RX Vega 56 | Quadro RTX 8000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,688 | 5,708 | -35.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 44 | 58 | -24.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 26 | 34 | -23.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 14 | 19 | -26.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 10.5 | 16.3 | -35.4% |
| VRAM | 8 GB HBM2 | 48 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 410 | 672 | -39.0% |
| TDP (W) | 210 | 295 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $399 | $5,500 | -92.7% |
- Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 24% faster.
- RX Vega 56 draws less power (210W vs 295W).
Verdict: RX Vega 56 or Quadro RTX 8000?
RX Vega 56 advantages
- Power efficiency (+29%)
- Affordability (+93%)
Quadro RTX 8000 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+24%)
- 4K gaming (+26%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+35%)
- Video memory (+83%)
- Memory bandwidth (+39%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX Vega 56 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX Vega 56 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
RX Vega 56 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
RX Vega 56 vs Quadro RTX 8000: which should you choose?
RX Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
Quadro RTX 8000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 48 GB of GDDR6, averaging 34 fps at 1440p; launched at $5,500.
RX Vega 56 vs Quadro RTX 8000: Quadro RTX 8000 is faster for gaming. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 24% faster. RX Vega 56 draws less power (210W vs 295W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps against 26. At 4K (14 vs 19 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 48GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 210 W versus 295 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $399 vs $5,500, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the RX Vega 56 better than the Quadro RTX 8000?
Quadro RTX 8000 takes the overall edge, though RX Vega 56 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 24% faster.
What is the main difference between the RX Vega 56 and the Quadro RTX 8000?
Quadro RTX 8000 averages 34 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 24% faster. RX Vega 56 draws less power (210W vs 295W).
Which is better value?
RX Vega 56 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX Vega 56 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Quadro RTX 8000 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.