Graphics Card Comparison

RX M Vega 64 vs RTX 5090

Verdict
RX M Vega 64 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M Vega 64RTX 5090Difference
3DMark Time Spy3,76640,000-90.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p45286-84.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p26183-85.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K14105-86.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)10.8104.8-89.7%
VRAM8 GB HBM232 GB GDDR7
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)4101,792-77.1%
TDP (W)191575
  • RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 86% faster.
  • RX M Vega 64 draws less power (191W vs 575W).

Verdict: RX M Vega 64 or RTX 5090?

Our recommendation
RTX 5090 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M Vega 64 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+67%)

RTX 5090 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+86%)
  • 4K gaming (+87%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+91%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+77%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.

RX M Vega 64 vs RTX 5090: which should you choose?

RX M Vega 64 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p.

RTX 5090 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2025, Blackwell) with 32 GB of GDDR7, averaging 183 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,999.

RX M Vega 64 vs RTX 5090: RTX 5090 is faster for gaming. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 86% faster. RX M Vega 64 draws less power (191W vs 575W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 5090 averages 183 fps against 26. At 4K (14 vs 105 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 32GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 191 W versus 575 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M Vega 64 better than the RTX 5090?

RTX 5090 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 86% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M Vega 64 and the RTX 5090?

RTX 5090 averages 183 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 86% faster. RX M Vega 64 draws less power (191W vs 575W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M Vega 64 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 5090 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M Vega 64 profile → RTX 5090 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons