Graphics Card Comparison

RX M Vega 56 vs Tesla K40

Verdict
RX M Vega 56 vs Tesla K40: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricRX M Vega 56Tesla K40Difference
3DMark Time Spy3,1361,764+77.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4031+29.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2317+35.3%
Avg FPS @ 4K129+33.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)9.05.0+77.8%
VRAM8 GB HBM212 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)410288+42.4%
TDP (W)136235
  • RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 35% faster.
  • RX M Vega 56 draws less power (136W vs 235W).

Verdict: RX M Vega 56 or Tesla K40?

Our recommendation
RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

RX M Vega 56 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+26%)
  • 4K gaming (+25%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+44%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+30%)
  • Power efficiency (+42%)

Tesla K40 advantages

  • Video memory (+33%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Tesla K40 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

RX M Vega 56 vs Tesla K40: which should you choose?

RX M Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 23 fps at 1440p.

Tesla K40 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 12 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p.

RX M Vega 56 vs Tesla K40: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 35% faster. RX M Vega 56 draws less power (136W vs 235W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps against 17. At 4K (12 vs 9 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 136 W versus 235 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the RX M Vega 56 better than the Tesla K40?

RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 35% faster.

What is the main difference between the RX M Vega 56 and the Tesla K40?

RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 35% faster. RX M Vega 56 draws less power (136W vs 235W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Tesla K40 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
RX M Vega 56 profile → Tesla K40 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons